Note:
In January 2015 your bloggers participated in an 8-day trip to Cuba
under the recently liberalized Obama "People to People" program. The
timing turned out to be fortuitous since the announcement of US-Cuban
mutual recognition and possibly far-reaching liberalization occurred
while we were there. Neither of us had focused professionally on Cuba
before the trip. In Havana we had access to a number of Cuban academics
and scholars concerned with economic and financial affairs. We did, of
course, arrive with a number of preconceptions, having lived through
some 60 years before and after the Cuban Revolution. In many ways what
we found was surprising.
Feb. 2, 2015By Roy C. Smith
A recent visit to Cuba
revealed as much enthusiasm in the streets of Havana, where signs still
proclaim “Socialism or Death,” as in the US for the 17 December announcements
by Presidents Obama and Castro to “normalize” relations. Normal relations would
change everything, but there is still a lot to do.
Indeed, the Cubans had little choice over whether to do this
as their economy is on the verge of collapse.
Cuba was Latin America’s third richest nation when the
Revolution occurred in 1959. Today it is the ninth, ranking 110th
globally in GDP per capita. Cuba exports some sugar and tobacco but imports
just about everything else, including 80% of its food.
Fidel Castro, now 88, declared his regime Communist in 1961;
everything was nationalized and turned into a Soviet style command economy with
85% of the workforce employed by the state. Its Utopian economic model depended
on massive support from the USSR for 30 years, and, after its demise, from
Venezuela, whose continued assistance is doubtful due to falling oil prices and
economic trouble at home.
Fidel emphasized social gains: effectively providing schools,
medical and other services so his “New Cuban Man” is today literate, healthy, and
classless.
But Cubans are also all equally poor with limited
opportunity for improvement. Once elegant buildings from the colonial and
post-colonial periods are crumbling into decay; there is still a housing
shortage so several families share buildings and apartments. The population is
aging and the birth rate is low. Few people have savings, and fewer still have
checking accounts or access to credit.
A university professor we met earns $30 a month and
freelances as a cab driver to supplement his income. His wife, a dentist, is on
a three-year contract in Yemen. The doorman at a chic new restaurant for
foreigners turned out to be a senior psychiatrist. Even the elite has to hustle
to make ends meet.
But, Big Changes
Since 2006
In 2006, after becoming ill, Fidel transferred power to his
brother Raul, now 83, and Raul succeed Fidel as President in 2008. Unlike his
charismatic, fanciful brother, Raul is taciturn, pragmatic and realistic. He
has recognized the need to reform the Cuban economy “to provide a more
prosperous and sustainable socialism.”
Raul quickly initiated a series of economic reforms that
cumulatively have changed Cuban life significantly. Most Americans and
Europeans have little appreciation of the considerable amount of deregulation
that has occurred in the eight years that preceded the 17 Dec. announcement.
Farmers may now lease land from the government to cultivate
whatever they want and keep half the profits. Accordingly, farmers markets have
begun to flourish and fresh produce is plentiful.
Cubans may travel abroad, and Cuban-Americans to Cuba, much
more freely.
The state still owns your home, but you have a right to live
in it that can now be sold. If a family is lucky enough to own a car, it will
probably be one that was on the road before 1959. Now, these “old timers” too
can be sold in what is now called the “offer and demand” market.
Small businesses now may be created. New shops, dance
studios, art galleries and restaurants have sprung up everywhere in people’s
homes or in leased spaced. Until recently these had to be one-family efforts,
but now they can be done as “co-ops,” in which several individuals can combine their
resources. Entrepreneurs in various forms are starting to get rich, creating
some early signs of income inequality.
In 2010 Raul began laying off 500,000 workers from 2,000 state
owned enterprises, forcing them to seek “self-employment” wherever they could
in the private economy.
This was followed by a second wave of 500,000 that would
mean a shift of about 20% of the country’s workforce to the private sector by
2016. This was the most drastic thing to occur in the socialist state economy
since its inception, and was shocking to most Cubans, but accepted without social
unrest.
In 2011, Raul pushed the Communist Party to adopt a further “311
Point” liberalization program, though much of it is yet to be implemented. One
point is to allow much more open discussion of ideas about reforms; an
influential cadre of bright, young economists from the University of Havana whom
we met has emerged to urge a much faster implementation of the reforms.
But even after all these efforts, the Cuban economy grew
only 1.4% in 2014.
On 15 January, President Obama announced a further
liberalization of US citizens’ travel in Cuba and remittances by Cuban
Americans, encouraging belief that the US is serious about normalization.
What Next?
Diplomatic negotiations have begun, but are expected to take
time and be cumbersome. There is no sign that the US trade embargo will be
lifted soon, but its lifting is now widely discussed in Congress and lobbied by
various interest groups.
Normal diplomatic relations will lead to more normal
economic ones that will open a floodgate of market forces-- of Americans
wanting to invest in the next great post-Communist turnaround opportunity, and of
Cubans wanting to sell agricultural commodities and anything else they can in
the US.
These new market forces will change things in Cuba faster
and more profoundly than anything else.
But for Cuba such a sharp conversion to market economics
represents a major existential challenge. If change occurs too quickly, as in
China, Cuban socialism, the pride and rationale of the Revolution, may
disappear. Raul and much of the old guard want to preserve the old system by
reforming it, not replace it with modern capitalism. They want to go slow to
protect Cuba’s socialism but once market forces are released and public
expectations build up, they may not be able to. Raul has said he will stand
down as President in 2018.
In the meantime, managing transition to a reformed,
semi-market economy is going to a major challenge. Cuba lacks almost all the
infrastructure it will need to move to the next level, including a basic financial
system (banking, securities, insurance) and modern agricultural and industrial
bases.
How well, and how quickly these can be created will
determine whether Cuba, with its 11 million well-educated, increasingly entrepreneurial
minded population can make the most of the opportunity. Doing so could mean ending
up as a successful Caribbean entrepot nation
(like Singapore) managing trade and finance throughout the region, transshipping
goods, developing light manufacturing and its gorgeous beaches for tourism.
This would require large amounts of foreign capital and managerial know-how that
Cuba currently lacks and government rules currently impede.
If it falls short of this, Cuba is likely to make it only to
being one of several, small, unimportant semi-socialist Caribbean island-economies
struggling to get by and competing with each other for tourism dollars.
Thus the stakes are high, and, at this point, the odds seem
fairly long. But there will be plenty of investors willing to take the bet. Its
going to be interesting one.
No comments:
Post a Comment